Wednesday, September 21, 2011

SIGNS OF HYPERINFLATION ON CHEST X-RAY

1. Height of the right lung greater than 29.9 cms.

2. Location of the right hemidiaphragm at or below the anterior aspect of the seventh rib.

3. Flattening of the hemidiaphragm

4. Enlargement of retrosternal space (on lateral chest x-ray)

5. Widening of the sternodiaphragmatic angle and

6. Narrowing of the transverse cardiac diameter.

---

- Felson's principles of chest roentgenology by Lawrence Goodman states that "When the right hemidiaphragm lies below the 10th posterior rib, it is diagnosed as hyperinflation". My HOD goes by the statement 2 in the above list. I wonder which of the both is true and if both are true, which is more true?


Friday, July 15, 2011

Choroid plexus cyst

It is important to remember that Choroid plexus cyst is just a transient finding on antenatal ultrasound and most of the cases resolve by third trimester.

Friday, July 8, 2011

A case of neck pain with vision abnormality

Today i felt stupid. The reason ... read below...

We got a case of MRI of brain today. As usual i went to them and enquired about the history of the case. She was a female roughly in her late 30s and complained of severe neck pain. She could turn the head to one side freely but could not do so on the other side. She also told me that there were visual disturbances in one eye, and she had hazy vision in that eye. She also told me that this particular vision disturbance would exaggerate when she sat down and washed her vessels (here i mean the household utensils :-) ) and suddenly got up after finishing the washing.
                 My stupid brain started to think about all the differential diagnoses. In the mean time i took the letter which was written by their neurophysician consultant to us requesting for an MRI. The lines went like this "MRI Brain for Optic nerve evaluation".
                I think i should not have read this above sentence, because that was where all the trouble started. I started thinking about all the optic nerve and orbit pathologies; all the occipital lobe disorders and other stuff.
                I went and told my Head of the Department that the MRI was ready and he arrived into the MRI console room. I sat beside with a note pad to take down the findings, like i always do. I gave him the history (i think i stressed on the neck pain and vision loss but didnot stress on the vision disturbance exaggeration after getting up finishing her cleaning of utensils). He looked for a long time at all the sections and we discussed about any hyperintense or hypointense signal in the occipital lobe. We could not find that in any plane or any section. Then our interest shifted to the optic nerves. The eye in which she complained of the defect; the optic nerve on that side showed a small kink when compared to the other side. I thought we nailed the diagnosis. But still my HOD kept telling me that it could be normal.
              After sometime i suggested him that we do a B-scan (USG of eye), which we did and found nothing significant. Both of us left for our afternoon meals thinking. Later after our afternoon meals, we had to perform a contrast pelvis CT on the wife of a retired medicine HOD. We did that too and the discussion about the PELVIS CT was going on in the chamber of our HOD, where the retired medicine HOD was also seated. I asked my HOD about the brain MRI case we did earlier that day, and what we were going to do about it.
            He said "I think there is a special term in medicine for the complaint the woman was mentioning in the morning (about the getting up after cleaning utensils and exaggeration of the visual blurring) and i don't remember it. Do you?". The retired medicine HOD who was sitting beside us (hearing the complaint) said "Yeah! that is condition called the VBI, also known as Vertebro basilar insufficiency and it is seen in certain conditions like cervical spondylosis (funny he mentioned cervical spondylosis first) and blah blah .blah ....."
          For me then everything started to fall in place and i felt stupid, but was still not convinced. I arrived home and searched for vertebrobasilar insufficiency on wikipedia. I felt ashamed of myself after reading the article, because the woman was actually giving me the diagnosis, and i could not get it.
          But then i thought "what can u expect from a postgraduate student of radiology who is just 2 months into the course". And then i thought "may be i ought to have known that". And i remembered what my HOD always said "Ask detailed history of every case you deal with and always refer to the old literature".

But then again, experience is what counts. "A man who does not make mistakes does not usually make anything".

LOOK AT THIS IMAGE AND READ THESE LINES FROM WIKIPEDIA and you will know what i am talking about ...

click on the image below for a larger picture ..


           
Here is a link to the whole article on Vertebrobasilar insufficiency. CLICK HERE 

Monday, June 13, 2011

GRE (Gradiant echo)

What type of MRI is that?????????????????

Plate atelectasis

Where is the plate?

Omnipaque

The first time i saw an INTRAVENOUS PYELOGRAM being done, i observed that the list of drugs included the OMNIPAQUE. So i began to wonder what omnipaque was? It was obvious that the word was a trade name of a drug. This is what i learnt later... Read below ...


Iohexol is a contrast agent, sold under the trade name Omnipaque. 

It is available in various concentrations, from 140 to 350 milligrams of iodine per milliliter. 

Omnipaque 350 is commonly used as a contrast agent during coronary angiography.

The osmolality of iohexol ranges from 322 mOsm/kg—approximately 1.1 times that of blood plasma—to 844 mOsm/kg, almost three times that of blood. 

Despite this difference, iohexol is still considered a low-osmolality contrast agent; the osmolality of older agents, such as diatrizoate, may be more than twice as high.



Gelastic seizures

can't just laugh it off...............

Luftsichel sign

The LUFTSICHEL sign (from German, meaning air crescent) is due to the overinflated superior segment of the ipsilateral lower lobe occupying the space between the mediastinum and the medial aspect of the collapsed upper lobe, resulting in a paramediastinal translucency.

The sign is more common on the left than the right and is regarded as a typical appearance of left upper lobe collapse.


(A) A left upper lobe collapse demonstrating paramediastinal lucency (arrow). (B) CT shows interposition of aerated lung between the collapse and the mediastinum (arrow). There is also a large right paratracheal node causing some distortion of the SVC.

Tuber cinereum hamartoma

What is that?

Friday, June 10, 2011

The appendix dilemma

Early in the morning today, we got a case of appendicitis which was already diagnosed and all we had to do was give them a picture of the ultrasound image so that they could get the surgery done free of cost.

My senior started finding the appendix(inflamed) with the probe and after he found it on the screen, freezed it and started taking measurements of the cross section of the appendix.

He freezed two images. One of the cross section and the other of the longitudinal section.

The diameter in the cross section image measured 6.7 mm and the diameter on the longitudinal section measured 7.3 mm (measured at the biggest bulge).

He could have given the cross section diameter, but instead he opted for the diameter in the longitudinal section, that is 7.3 mm.

I started thinking. The book GRAINGER AND ALLISON DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, gives the measurement of 7mm or greater than 7mm, as diagnostic of appendicitis, where as DAVID SUTTON radiology gives the measurement of greater than 6.5 mm as diagnostic of appendicitis.

Though all the other ultrasound signs of acute appendicitis were present, i was wondering

*if there was an exact value of diameter of appendix that was diagnostic of appendicitis?

*if the value changed from country to country or from gender to gender?

*if the diagnosis can be given even with smaller measurements when there are certain additional signs?

First things First

I am a Postgraduate in MD RADIODIAGNOSIS from INDIA, who has joined the course very recently.


The other day i was thinking about starting a blog where i would be able to share my experiences with other postgraduates, as well as senior residents and professors, who can guide me through my course and clear my doubts if any.

So here it is.

Feel free to comment.

THANK YOU.